Capone

In The Untouchables, Bobby De Niro’s Al Capone could make you figuratively shit your pants. Tom Hardy’s Capone, on the other hand, literally soils his own pants. In the Godfather, Don Vito Corleone leaves, through Luca Brassi, a horse’s head on Jack Woltz’s bed. In Capone, the only thing the titular character leaves in a bed, which happens to be, once again, his own, is his dinner — after he has digested it. I know comparisons are odious, but then this movie would suck even without measuring it up against the classics of the genre.

This film is arguably the second lowest point in the Al Capone mythos, the absolute nadir being of course The Mystery of Al Capone’s Vault — and not unlike Geraldo Rivera, Capone purports to give us access to the vault that was the mobster’s psyche during his last days (the events of the movie take place during Al Capone’s final year on Earth, when the notorious criminal was “no longer considered a threat” to anyone or anything other than his underwear or a clean set of bed sheets), and the result is equally disappointing.

On paper no movie should be truly bad that includes Hardy (or at least the Tom Hardy I remember from The Revenant), Kyle MacLachlan and Matt Dillon, but Capone gives them very little to do. MacLachlan looks as if he got lost on his way to the Twin Peaks set, Dillon wastes his considerable talent on some sort of Sixth Sense-esque routine, and Hardy spends the entire film wearing a prosthetic mask that covers the entire surface of his face and skull, making him look like Michael Myers in Halloween 3000: Massacre at the Old Folks Home.

The worst part of the whole thing is that most of the plot unfolds solely in the protagonist’s feverish, senile mind, and while there’s nothing wrong with a film that reflects the deteriorated mental state of a character (e.g., The Machinist), my problem is that director/writer Josh Trank has no way of knowing what was going on in Al Capone’s head during his last days of life; in other words, he’s making this shit up as he goes, and this burdens the film with a double layer of unreality.

Put another way, we are dealing with not one, but two levels of fantasy; there’s the character’s ravings, and then there’s the filmmaker’s musings as to what the actual person’s ravings might have been. We cannot expect to gain any new insights from this approach, and indeed the film fails to reveal anything important or relevant about its subject.

Related Reviews

The Tax Collector (2020)

The Tax Collector is the third-best David Ayer-directed film (the top two would be End of Watch and The Beekeeper), but it’s far from the best David Ayers-penned movie — though to be fair, that includes Training Day and Dark Blue, as well as the aforementioned End of Watch. This one may not reach the heights…

Keep reading

Three Day Millionaire (2022)

Three Day Millionaire is, for want of a better term, clickbait filmmaking. The opening scenes are dominated by an aesthetic that goes out of its way to misrepresent the movie as a Guy Ritchie work. And the title sounds suspiciously like Danny Boyle’s Slumdog Millionaire. Thus, director Jack Spring appoints himself a member of an exclusive club…

Keep reading

Final Heist (2024)

Why do characters in heist movies always talk about ‘one last job’ but never mean it? Although I guess Final Heist is true to its word, since the film is not about a heist so much as a, well, there’s no single word for it, so let’s just call it a partial prison breakout.  The…

Keep reading

Loading…

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.

Comments are closed.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started